Nolan Auerbach & White is an experienced Hospital Fraud Law Firm helping courageous whistleblowers.
With over 25 years of experience, the Healthcare Fraud Lawyers at Nolan, Auerbach & White have made their mark as The Whistleblower Firm.
If you’ve become aware of Covid-19 Testing Fraud including evidence that claims were falsely submitted to the HRSA Covid-19 Uninsured Program instead of private insurance companies, we invite you to learn more about the vital role courageous whisteblowers play in recovering taxpayer dollars stolen from Government Healthcare Programs.
Call Nolan Auerbach & White at 800-372-8304 to learn more about how we guide whistleblowers through the reporting of Covid-19 fraud.
SPEAK WITH THE WHISTLEBLOWER FIRM
Shortly after Covid hit the shores of the United States, Congress passed several laws, with ample funding attached to them, to make sure that ALL Americans, regardless of whether they had health insurance, would be entitled to obtain Covid tests and vaccines, easily and quickly.
The Program, as enacted by Congress, was called the Covid-19 Claims Reimbursement to Healthcare Providers and Facilities for Testing Treatment and Vaccine Administration for the Uninsured Program (“HRSA Covid-19 Uninsured Program”). It was a great policy move and helped to get a much higher percentage of residents tested and vaccinated.
Unfortunately, its rules, regulations, and/or implementation have left much to be desired, and as such, the “uninsured” status of individuals receiving testing and vaccination has been wholly unchecked and otherwise not scrutinized by the United States.
“HRSA” is the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), an agency of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. , Its mission is as the primary federal agency for improving health care to people who are geographically isolated, economically or medically vulnerable. Since March 2020, the HRSA Covid-19 Uninsured Program has provided claims reimbursement to health care providers for COVID-19 testing (as well as treatment and vaccine administration) for uninsured individuals.
The HRSA Covid-19 Uninsured Program is funded via (1) the FFCRA Relief Fund, which includes funds received from the Public Health and Social Services Emergency Fund, as appropriated in the FFCRA and the Paycheck Protection Program and Health Care Enhancement Act (PPPHCEA) (Pub. L. 116-139), which each appropriated funding to reimburse providers for conducting COVID-19 testing for the uninsured, and (2) the Provider Relief Fund, as appropriated in the CARES Act and the PPPHCEA.
Individuals must meet the definition of an uninsured individual (FFCRA Section 1902(ss), as amended by section 1902(a)(10)(A)(i)(VIII) of the Act); Not be enrolled in a group health plan or health insurance coverage offered by a health insurance issuer (e.g. marketplace coverage, employer-sponsored health insurance, retiree health plans, and COBRA); Not be enrolled in another health care program funded by the federal government (e.g. Medicare, TRICARE, Veterans Administration, and federal employee health plans); and not be enrolled in Medicaid.
When enrolling as a provider participant, providers are required to certify “that to the best of its knowledge, the customers identified on the claim form were “Uninsured Individuals” at the time the services were provided.”
Providers are required to acknowledge, as a condition of participation and payment in the HRSA Covid-19 Uninsured Program, that each time the provider submits a Covid test or vaccine claim for reimbursement, the provider is certifying that to the best of its knowledge, the patients identified on the claim form are uninsured individuals at the time the services were provided.
Thus, providers have the express duty to ask customers themselves if they have coverage, AND independently check for health care coverage eligibility to confirm that the customer is uninsured.
As indications lead us to believe that multiple providers engaged in fraud by not doing so, thousands of claims submitted to the Uninsured Program were paid by the United States that should have been paid for by private insurance companies. The customers administered Covid-19 tests and vaccines did not meet the definition of an “uninsured individual” as required by the Uninsured Program, and, in fact, were insured by private insurance companies.
If you would like more information about Healthcare Fraud or whistleblower laws and whistleblower protection, complete this form and we will respond the same day.
Kathleen Hawkins, RN MSN, had been employed by Defendant, Catholic Healthcare West (CHW) for approximately 6 years when she decided she had had enough of trying to change the hospital system from within.
CHW, a California not-for-profit corporation that operated hospitals in California, Arizona, and Nevada, was at the time the eighth largest hospital system in the nation and the largest not-for-profit hospital provider in California.
Joe Strom contacted us in 2005. We were very grateful that he did. We immediately formed an all-star legal team and a process to stop a very harmful pharmaceutical marketing strategy. It was this process we set into motion that ultimately returned hundreds of millions of dollars to the U.S. Treasury, and a portion of that, very well-deserved, into Joe’s bank account.
Joe told us a very troubling story about the off-label promotion of a pharmaceutical drug for patients who already suffered from chronic heart failure.
Bruce Moilan was a seasoned hospital systems expert by the time he contacted our Firm. At the time he decided to file his qui tam lawsuit, he was employed by South Texas Health System as a System Director for Materials Management. In this position, he oversaw $24 million in annual purchases of supplies and equipment and helped determine budget, reduction and cost analysis throughout the contract bidding and negotiations process. His job was to insure proper implementation for purchasing, receiving and management of inventory, for McAllen Hospitals, L.P.
