Providers Will Find 2011 Is ‘Big Year’ for Regulations, Recoupment, Whistleblowers

Providers Will Find 2011 Is ‘Big Year’ for Regulations, Recoupment, Whistleblowers
Report on Medicare Compliance
January 17, 2011

In this issue, a respected healthcare trade publication interviewed Nolan Auerbach partner Jeb White about the increased number of qui tam filings against hospitals. “Compliance officers are probably the largest contingency of whistleblowers in the hospital setting,” said White. “It makes sense. Compliance officers raise issues to their bosses, who [sometimes] say ‘stop looking.’ Compliance officers are alienated, isolated, terminated — and then they call me.”

OUR PROMISE Being a healthcare whistleblower can feel like David taking on Goliath. We help level the playing field.

Our law practice is dedicated exclusively to representing healthcare whistleblowers who are willing to take a stand against unscrupulous corporations that are ripping off our government. Whether the fraud involves __________, we pride ourselves on unparalleled level of service, support and legal assistance for our clients.
Contact Us

Contact Us

The more detailed the response, the more likely it is that we will be able to evaluate and determine if your potential False Claims Act case falls within our case requirements. If it does, WE WILL RESPOND TO YOU WITHIN 24 HOURS. (Names of potential defendants are not necessary at this point, should you feel more comfortable omitting them.) By law, all communications to us are 100% confidential.

Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
No. of Employees at the Company?


Please read the following statement and then click “Send Form”:

Any response to your e-mail will be solely to communicate about our possible representation of you under the qui tam provisions of the False Claims Act. All e-mails submitted to us, whether we take your case or not, are 100% confidential. If we do not respond to your e-mail, then you have communicated information which we cannot address because it appears to fall outside of the False Claims Act or our case requirements.