The Prosecution of Pharma Gets Personal

The Prosecution of Pharma Gets Personal
Nature Medicine
April 1, 2011

In September 2010, Nature Medicine asked Jeb White to tackle the number one issue undermining government healthcare programs. In a widely-circulated Op-ed piece, Mr. White opined that pharmaceutical fraud was a continuing drain on government healthcare programs because the masterminds of the frauds steal with impunity and never face jail time. In a follow-up April 2011 article, Nature credited Mr. White’s Op-ed piece for spotlighting this enforcement blind spot. Since then, a number of government officials have echoed these arguments in the halls of Congress.

OUR PROMISE Being a healthcare whistleblower can feel like David taking on Goliath. We help level the playing field.

Our law practice is dedicated exclusively to representing healthcare whistleblowers who are willing to take a stand against unscrupulous corporations that are ripping off our government. Whether the fraud involves __________, we pride ourselves on unparalleled level of service, support and legal assistance for our clients.
Contact Us

Contact Us

The more detailed the response, the more likely it is that we will be able to evaluate and determine if your potential False Claims Act case falls within our case requirements. If it does, WE WILL RESPOND TO YOU WITHIN 24 HOURS. (Names of potential defendants are not necessary at this point, should you feel more comfortable omitting them.) By law, all communications to us are 100% confidential.

Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
No. of Employees at the Company?


Please read the following statement and then click “Send Form”:

Any response to your e-mail will be solely to communicate about our possible representation of you under the qui tam provisions of the False Claims Act. All e-mails submitted to us, whether we take your case or not, are 100% confidential. If we do not respond to your e-mail, then you have communicated information which we cannot address because it appears to fall outside of the False Claims Act or our case requirements.